In Style: Lessons in Clarity and Grace, Joseph M. Williams and Joseph Bizup discussed methods for motivating coherence, arguing that we read not just about an interesting topic, but about a problem that is important to us. They say, “don’t imagine your task as just writing about a topic, passing on information that happens to interest you. See yourself as posing a problem that your readers want to see solved” (p. 165).
In the chapter, they identified three elements to motivate coherence within the introduction:
Shared context statement. Open with a seeming truth or an idea shared by your and your audience to establish a common ground. For example, you might say something like, “In our field, many have defined plain language as social justice.” As this example shows, shared context statements establish a common ground between you and your audience.
Problem statement. Here is where you imagine your readers responding to your shared context statement: So what?. Here is where you ask a question. And to ask a question is to pose a problem that you are going to solve for your readers. Signal to your readers that you are stating the problem with a “but” — “But [ask your question, state a problem here].” For example, “But, how does plain language embody social justice”
Solution. Conclude your introduction with your main point and a road map for the rest of the report. In other words, tell your reader where you are taking them and why. “In this paper, I analyze how [state your main point or thesis].”
On your draft, identify these elements:
Shared context statement:
Video games tutorials are meant to teach vai x, y, and Z to meet the challenge the developer has set out for their audience
Technology is closely connected to PC field and has consequences
Crisis in universities are common and are left to TCers to handle
The political movement in the US has built power via consitutive rhetoirc and a shared identity
In defining PC and audience, human centered design has emerged as a means of success
Problem statement:
But, through the internet some people struggle to meet the challenges despite the instructions
BUT, people tend to comfort themselves with an all or nothing mindset. What are the consequences? What is the dynamic?
BUT, communication within universities lack in their effectiveness
BUT, how have recent policy maneuvers such as education legislation in FL have been targeted at undermnining education of oppressed people's history
BUT how can HCD and PL center marginalized groups?
3. Solution
In this paper, I examine how we as tech communicators apply our knowledge to tutorial design, particularly how aural and visual rhetoric can meet the challenge
In this paper, I examine how we cannot escage the dynamic and exercise caution
TC can take a variety of steps to improve crisis communication (so many problems and so many solutions)
In this paper, I analyze how these legislation are a product of constitute rhetoric and identity based to shape or constitute preserve the community that was established through conflict and scapegoating.
In this paper, I share examples to argue that planin language and HCD are necessary..... essential measures for PCers. PL is more than that.
ExAMPle
An example can ground the paper